Said traces imperial conquest back to centuries-old Western habits of representing the Orient

Evidence

According to this interpretation Said’s phrase ā€˜Orientalism overrode the Orient could mean only that the Institutional OrientalĀ­ism which invaded and subjugated the East was really the legitimate child and product of that other kind of Orientalism, so intrinsic, it seems, to the minds, texts, aesthetics, representations, lore and imagery of Westerners as far back as Homer, Aeschylus and Euripides! To understand properly the subjugation of the East in modern times, Said keeps referring us back to earlier times when the Orient was no more than an awareness, a word, a representation, a piece of learning to the Occident — Sadik Jalal al-ā€˜Azm, Orientalism and Orientalism in Reverse, 22

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the additive-definitional mapping of Orientalism debate (al-ā€˜Azm’s whole essay, and Said’s thesis itself).