Said presents colonial figures as products of Orientalist discourse rather than material interests

Evidence

One cannot escape the impression that for Said somehow the emerĀ­gence of such observers, administrators and invaders of the Orient as Napoleon, Cromer and Balfour was made inevitable by ā€˜Orientalism’, and that the political orientations, careers and ambitions of these figures are better understood by reference to d’Herbelot and Dante than to more immediately relevant and mundane interests. — Sadik Jalal al-ā€˜Azm, Orientalism and Orientalism in Reverse, 24

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Al-ā€˜Azm’s compression of Said’s view invites the question of where material causation actually sits in Said’s argument—is this a fair reading or a strawman?
  • XREF: connects to: Said’s Orientalism replaced Marxism with Foucauldian Discourse Theory; Said frames anti-imperial resistance chiefly as cultural discourse and identity