Runnymede’s 1997 definition founded but did not fix the field’s usage

Evidence

With the publication of the runnymede report in 1997, not only did the report significantly influence the way in which Islamophobia was understood but so too did it ensure that Islamophobia was afforded public and political recognition. Preceded by a consultation document in March 1997,40 it was the first source to posit a firm definition of Islamophobia: the ‘shorthand way of referring to dread or hatred of Islam – and, therefore, to fear or dislike all or most Muslims’. … Yet still, Islamophobia remains something of an ambiguous entity and becomes apparent in some sources more so than others — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 80

Categorization

  • DEFINE: This is the exact Runnymede definition (‘dread or hatred of Islam’ / ‘fear or dislike all or most Muslims’) that anchors the reader’s module on definitional camps.
  • XREF: Directly relevant to the reading goal’s mapping of Runnymede’s 1997 framework against Bleich’s neutral social-scientific and the 2017 racialization turn. — connects to: Runnymede’s open-closed framework never penetrated everyday media discourse — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us…, 622; The 1997 Runnymede definition fused hostility to Islam with discrimination against Muslims — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us…, 158; The Runnymede report’s definition is self-reinforcing and theoretically weak — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 915 (+2 more)

Broader Connections