Religious priming transfers prejudice most strongly toward LGBT and atheist targets

Evidence

We also calculated the overall effect of religious priming on prejudice for each target group. However, power analyses revealed that only analyses of the LGBT and atheist target groups were adequately powered (LGBT group power = .95, atheist group power = .72) so we report only the results for those two groups, summarized in Table 2.1 Both effects were significant: r = .12, [.05, .19], p < .01, for LGBT people and r = .09, [.01, .17], p < .05, for atheists. — Alexandra Snell, Miron Zuckerman, and Bonnie M. Le, Does Religious Priming Induce Greater…, 40

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Do these two targets share a moderator (both are perceived as overtly antireligious/secular or value-threatening) that a transfer hypothesis would predict, versus targets like Black or Arab people?
  • XREF: Connects to the reading purpose — whether outgroup hostility transfers across different target categories rather than only within the primed outgroup. — connects to: Religious priming causally increases prejudice toward LGBT people and atheists — Annetta Snell and Miron Zuckerman and Bonnie M. Le, Does Religious Priming Induce Greater…, 108; Religious priming elevates prejudice against LGBT people and atheists beyond other targets. — Annetta Snell and Miron Zuckerman and Bonnie M. Le, Does Religious Priming Induce Greater…, 40; Religious priming method does not meaningfully alter prejudice outcomes — Alexandra Snell, Miron Zuckerman, and Bonnie M. Le, Does Religious Priming Induce Greater…, 103 (+18 more)

Broader Connections