The studies lack power to test cross-category moderation by target group.

Evidence

Consistent with the present results, it appears that religion allows or even encourages treating LGBT people and atheists as outsiders. However, due to the low number of studies with certain groups, we were unable to establish whether LGBT and atheist groups are significantly more likely to be the targets of prejudice after religious priming compared with other groups. Likewise, low power also prevented adequate testing of religious priming effects on individual targets beyond LGBT and atheist groups. Clearly, we need additional research that will include a large range of targets, allowing adequately powered tests of moderation by target group. — Alexandra Snell, Miron Zuckerman, and Bonnie M. Le, Does Religious Priming Induce Greater…, 92

Categorization

• XREF: Directly relevant to the reader’s goal: an adequately powered direct test of whether religious priming transfers hostility across DIFFERENT target categories has apparently not been done - this is the gap the reader is probing.
• SEED: The stated need for ‘a large range of targets, allowing adequately powered tests of moderation by target group’ is essentially a research agenda for the reader’s own meta-analytic question about cross-category hostility transfer.