Religious conviction type rather than strength predicts measured racism

Evidence

As predicted, the answer to the question of whether religious people are more racially prejudiced depended on the social-cognitive motives under­ lying religiosity. Table 2 displays the mean effect size for each dimension of religiosity. Consistent with our hypothe­ ses, greater religious identification, greater extrinsic religiosity, and greater religious fundamentalism were all positively related to racism. Greater intrinsic religiosity and greater quest were negatively related to racism, a relation that reflected racial tolerance. Suggesting that these effects reflected the specific social-cognitive motives tapped by each form of religiosity, scales assessing orthodoxy and other aspects of religious belief content did not reliably cor­ relate with racism. — Deborah L. Hall and David C. Matz and Wendy Wood, Why Don’t We Practice What We Preach? A…, 42

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly answers the meta-analysis question: self-reported conviction (orthodoxy/belief content) does NOT predict measured bias, while social-cognitive motives do — the divergence between professed belief and measured bias the reading purpose is chasing. — connects to: Strong religious identification predicts derogation of out-group members rather than anti-prejudice conviction. — Deborah L. Hall and David C. Matz and Wendy Wood, Why Don’t We Practice What We Preach? A…, 11; Self-reported religious conviction diverges from measured racial tolerance — Deborah L. Hall and David C. Matz and Wendy Wood, Why Don’t We Practice What We Preach? A…, 77; Self-reported religiosity reliably but weakly predicts racial prejudice (+9 more)
  • ADDENDUM: The finding that orthodoxy and belief content don’t correlate with racism while extrinsic/identification/fundamentalism do parallels the divergence between professed conviction and measured bias central to the reader’s research.

Broader Connections