Neither intrinsic nor social religion predicts measured implicit racial bias

Evidence

Religious orientations were not correlated with the race-IAT effect (rintrinsic = .06; rextrinsic–social = .07; rextrinsic–personal = .06; rquest = –.15). When simultaneously regressed on the race-IAT effect, intrinsic ( .07), extrinsic–social ( .07), extrinsic–personal ( .09), and quest ( = –.16) did not account for unique variation when we controlled for the other orientations and impression management ( = .03, R = .20). — Wade C. Rowatt and Lewis M. Franklin, Christian Orthodoxy, Religious…, 73

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly bears on the reader’s question of whether professed religious conviction diverges from actual measured bias — it diverges entirely. — connects to: Religious conviction type rather than strength predicts measured racism — Deborah L. Hall and David C. Matz and Wendy Wood, Why Don’t We Practice What We Preach? A…, 42; Self-reported religiosity reliably but weakly predicts racial prejudice; Intrinsic religion’s low-prejudice link vanishes under non-self-report measures (+3 more)
  • SEED: Supports the reader’s essay thread on professed egalitarian/religious conviction failing to predict measured implicit bias.

Broader Connections