Regime change and contention mutually shape each other over long periods

Evidence

The South African political actors who struggled with one another during the 1980s had emerged from two centuries of interaction between changing regimes and changing forms of contention. — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 549

Categorization

• XREF: This concisely states the book’s central interactive thesis linking to Tilly’s whole framework. — connects to: Regime change and contentious politics mutually shape one another — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 38; Contention-driven regime transformation remains an unanswered puzzle; Contention forms are regime-bound but also historically embedded — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 231 (+9 more)
• corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 549

Broader Connections

• Contention forms are regime-bound but also historically embedded #expands (0.82) — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 231
• Laws of contention vary by regime type and era. #expands (0.80) — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 365
• Contention-driven regime transformation remains an unanswered puzzle #complicates (0.78)
• Regime change drives repertoire change more than popular consciousness does #qualifies (0.76)
• Regime-internal relational shifts drive contention against both bottom-up and top-down causality #qualifies (0.75) — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 659