Radicalization theories justify treating Muslims as an imperial scapegoat class

Evidence

But every theory has its cracks. And the fissures in this one were larger than in others. “Radicalization theory” focused exclusively on Muslims, and like eugenics or the bell curve and grand racial or religious theories crafted before it, saw Islam as inherently violent. Islam itself, a religion so heterogeneous and deeply layered, was deemed prone to terrorism by a new theory that, like other bigoted philosophies, reduced the “essence” of entire peoples to vile stereotypes. Muslims were flatly reduced to presumptive terrorists, and the War on Terror imposed that as the worldview of its agents and enforcers, spies and soldiers. — Khaled A. Beydoun, The New Crusades_ Islamophobia and the…, 138 (#expands, via linked claim)

While “extremism” is framed in racially and religiously neutral terms, and CVE policing is theoretically focused on all culprits of extremism, it is disproportionately if not entirely focused on “ideas” and behavioral “processes” linked to Islam and expressions of Muslim identity. Radicalization, therefore, is theorized as an exclusively Muslim phenomenon, much like its precedent and related enterprise, terrorism. — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding…, 377 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Orientalist binaries made imperial intervention in Muslim societies seem morally obligatory. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 184; Imperial violence is projected onto Muslims to appear proportionate — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 355; Liberal societies displace their imperial violence onto Muslims’ supposed inherent nature. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 355 (+12 more)

Broader Connections