Racial identity requires shared history and community, not just culture or phenotype.

Evidence

Underlying racialism, not unlike nationalism, is an abstract presumption of familialism. As Nadia Abu El-Haj remarks in her revealing interrogation of genealogy in the wake of the human genome project, membership criteria “in family, nation and political society are always entangled.” The traits or characteristics I take myself to share with those I consider like me conjure an abstract familial connectivity. That I am like them, or they like me, must mean that we are familially connected, so to speak. But familiality, by extension, is necessarily conceived, if often silently, by the negation of (racial) otherness, of the differentiated and disconnected, the unlikened and unrelated. — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race, 68 (#expands, via linked claim)

If we accept that races are not biological but social, then they can be nothing but amalgams of different identities and practices including practices of gender and sexuality, geography, ethnicity, and linguistic identity, as well as the social recognition by other members of the race. Even if we often use proxies for race such as phenotype, color, class, or cultural markers, these can be deceptive. Rachel Dolezal, after all, was able to pass for Black with surprising ease even though she was once a white child. — Cyra Akila Choudhury, Racecraft and Identity in the Emergence…, 89 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source
  • XREF: connects to: Racial identity rests on an abstract presumption of familial connectedness. — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 68; Ethnic communities are physically distinguishable and bonded by shared customs and history; Race operates to tie culture, body, and behavior together (+4 more)

Broader Connections