Post-Cold War conflict was framed by Huntington as civilizational cultural clash

Evidence

Future global politics and wars will not be between ideologically opposing super-powers as in the Cold War era but rather between civilizations holding diametrically opposed cultural values, Huntington argues. In this scheme, Islam represents the ultimate threat to Western civilization for, according to Huntington, “Islam has bloody borders” (Huntington, 1993, p. — Sarah Bracke and Luis Manuel Hernández Aguilar, “They Love Death as We Love Life”, 174

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly echoes The Reluctant Fundamentalist (Hamid), whose protagonist watches the world get re-sorted into civilizational blocs after 9/11. — connects to: Lewis and Huntington argued Islam itself, not fundamentalism, underlies the West’s problem — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 315; Huntington attributes complex world conflicts to unchanging civilizational essences — Sherene Razack, Casting Out: The Eviction of Muslims…, 208; Huntington premised the Clash of Civilizations thesis a decade before its wartime use — Khaled A. Beydoun, The New Crusades_ Islamophobia and the…, 229 (+11 more)
  • SEED: Angle: how an academic thesis with a question mark became a policy frame with none — the punctuation history of the ‘clash of civilizations’.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Sarah Bracke and Luis Manuel Hernández Aguilar, “They Love Death as We Love Life”: The…, 174

Broader Connections