Performance bureaucracy functions as discipline, not efficiency improvement

Evidence

Given that this clearly does not increase efficiency, we need to see it as a disciplinary mechanism, an ideological, ritualising system. If you are a teacher sitting at home filling in lots of forms full of quasi-business rhetoric, you are not going to teach a better lesson the next day. In fact, if you just watched TV and relaxed, you would probably be better equipped in that regard. But the authorities are not idiots: they know this; they know they are not really increasing your performance. — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk, 1659

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly parallels the professional-targets critique also found in David Graeber’s Bullshit Jobs. — connects to: Surveillance-based grading audits bureaucratic compliance, not actual performance — Mark Fisher, Capitalist Realism: Is There No…, 104; Bureaucracy expands through technical superiority over other organizational forms; Managerialist bureaucracy works as intended by weakening labour and worker autonomy — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk: The Collected and Unpublished…, 1493 (+6 more)

Broader Connections