Perceived threat to in-group status evokes greater political conservatism.

Evidence

It is less clear whether more social, rather than physical, threats engender conservative shift. Initial research examining reactions to majority-minority racial demographic shifts revealed that Whites considering a future White minority perceived the shift as a threat to their racial group’s societal status, and this perception led them to express more negative racial attitudes and emotions (Craig & Richeson, in press; Outten, Schmitt, Miller, & Garcia, 2012). We propose that in addition to affecting intergroup relations, perceived threat to the societal status of one’s in-group, like other perceived threats, can engender greater political conservatism. In a study consistent with this idea, Thórisdóttir and Jost (2011) found that threats to personal well-being, their political party, or the economic system all led center-right politicians to take more conservative stances. — Maureen A. Craig and Jennifer A. Richeson, On the Precipice of a…, 12

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Key question for the reading purpose: is the group-status→conservatism link threatened-privilege mobilization, and does the effect hinge on anticipatory status threat specifically?
  • XREF: Connects to threatened-privilege mobilization research across identity axes and to the reading’s guiding hypothesis that majority-minority projections convert latent threat into ideology. — connects to: Perceived racial demographic shifts cause a conservative shift in White Americans through group-status threat. — Maureen A. Craig and Jennifer A. Richeson, On the Precipice of a…, 8; Group-status threat is the proposed causal mediator of shift-induced conservatism. — Maureen A. Craig and Jennifer A. Richeson, On the Precipice of a…, 22; Anticipatory status threat directly shifts reported political identity toward conservatism. — Maureen A. Craig and Jennifer A. Richeson, On the Precipice of a…, 69 (+12 more)

Broader Connections