People feel moral obligations they never actually agreed to.

Evidence

According to the target article, humans possess inordinately stable intuitions about the existence of a tacit contract that commits them to behave morally – for example, to help those in need and desire punishment for those in guilt. Paradoxically, people also know that there exists (within the sphere and limits of their biofunctional cognition) no moral contract that they have signed or to which they have agreed by choice or otherwise. — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality, 460

Categorization

  • XREF: This is the ‘missing contract’ formulation of the puzzle at the heart of the reader’s reading purpose — the mystery of why uncoerced moral behavior exists at all, which connects to Norenzayan’s Big God mechanism and the fumi-e logic in the analytical integration. — connects to: Received moral imperatives often mask what we actually care about. — Janet Burroway; Elizabeth Stuckey-French; Ned Stuckey-French, Writing Fiction, Tenth Edition: A Guide…, 64; Interests crystallize into perceived moral commitments through psychological supervenience.; Human moral behavior may originate in mere conformity to convention, not genuine morality. — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality: The…, 541 (+3 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: The juxtaposition — stable intuitions of a contract that provably was never signed — captures a genuinely deep paradox about the phenomenology of moral obligation that resists one-sentence summary.

Broader Connections