Outbidders may damage a peace process only as a byproduct of attacking intragroup rivals.

Evidence

Importantly, political actors engaged in outbidding may regard influencing the peace process as a secondary aim. In such cases a civil war may be largely contained in one part of the state or may occupy the attentions of few but the governing party. Outbidders may have no serious interest in the peace process and may simply identify the government’s handling of it as an issue upon which they can exercise leverage over intragroup rivals. Thus negative impacts on the peace process may merely be collateral to the core aim of embarrassing a rival party. — Cathy Gormley-Heenan and Roger Macginty, Ethnic Outbidding and Party…, 31

Categorization

  • XREF: Complicates the reader’s outbidding-against-democratic-regime comparison: here outbidding’s primary target is intra-ethnic rivals, not the regime. Directly relevant to weighing Northern Ireland against Kenya/Zambia along ‘target of mobilization’ rather than regime type alone. — connects to: Threat can redirect hostility toward unrelated weaker outgroups — Walter G. Stephan, Oscar Ybarra, Kimberly Rios Morrison, Intergroup Threat Theory, 20; Outbidders weaponize fear narratives while discounting deferred peace benefits. — Cathy Gormley-Heenan and Roger Macginty, Ethnic Outbidding and Party…, 32; Aggressors with impunity lack incentive to accept peace plans — Michael A. Sells, The Bridge Betrayed: Religion and…, 597 (+2 more)

Broader Connections