Orthodox sociology assumes social regulation produces morality and restrains savagery

Evidence

On such a view (implicitly if not explicitly) one thing that emerges from the experience of the Holocaust intact and unscathed is the humanizing and/or rationalizing (the two concept are used synonymously) impact of social organization upon inhuman drives which rule the conduct of preor anti-social individuals. Whatever moral instinct is to be found in human conduct is socially produced. It dissolves once society malfunctions. … By implication, the presence of effective social regulation makes such disregard unlikely. The thrust of social regulation – and thus of modern civilization, prominent as it is for pushing regulative ambitions to limits never heard of before – is the imposition of moral constraints on otherwise rampant selfishness and inborn savagery of the animal in man. — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 47

Categorization

  • XREF: This is the key premise Bauman will dismantle — the assumption that civilization imposes moral constraint — which sets up his later argument that bureaucracy and rational means-end logic, not unleashed savagery, enabled the Holocaust. — connects to: The ignoble savage concept helped launch Enlightenment theories of social development; The language of sociology makes morally unsanctioned behavior unspeakable and thus unthinkable — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 601; Sociology treats social learning as the unexamined root of all human morality — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 601 (+11 more)

Broader Connections