Opposition within Arab states is reframed as treason to the pan-Arab cause

Evidence

The atmosphere that characterizes the Tunisian political discourse under Kais Saied is reminiscent of the one that prevailed in Nasser’s Egypt (or that prevails in Sisi’s Egypt today). But overall, the official narrative is that the struggle is taking place, and at moments it sounds as if Tunisia is on an anti-imperialist crusade. Mirroring the Algerian case, many of those who oppose the regime are treated as traitors not only to the country but to the broader Arab cause. — Youssef Cherif, Neo-pan-Arabism, 105

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s question about whether professed conviction tracks real bias vs. divergence — the regime discourse positions domestic opponents as external-collaborating traitors, manufacturing threat to harden internal solidarity. — connects to: Arab regimes weaponize pan-Arab slogans against internal grassroots uprisings. — Youssef Cherif, Neo-pan-Arabism: a renewed contract of…, 69; Siege regimes criminalize opposition and cross-societal solidarity as treason — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 677; Regimes branded grassroots uprisings as external anti-Arab conspiracies. — Youssef Cherif, Neo-pan-Arabism: a renewed contract of…, 69 (+1 more)

Broader Connections