Observable disputes in trade cannot be resolved without verification of the underlying claims

Evidence

We now consider in more detail a model of trade in which outsiders cannot readily observe what has transpired in a given bilateral trade. While “disputes” may arise in which one party accuses the other of cheating, none of the other players have a method of freely verifying the parties’ claims. Even if the dispute itself can be observed by others, they cannot costlessly determine whether cheating by one has actually occurred or whether the other is opportunistically claiming that it did. — PAUL R. MILGRO, PAUL R. MILGRO - THE ROLE OF…, 68

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Establishes the key modeling distinction: observing a dispute is not the same as verifying who cheated — the chapter’s central analytical puzzle.
  • XREF: connects to: Disputed quality enforcement ends with exit rather than arbitration; Reputation alone cannot sustain honest trading without third-party registration.; Centralized adjudicators solve trade by combining information storage with dispute resolution — PAUL R. MILGRO, PAUL R. MILGRO - THE ROLE OF…, 79 (+8 more)

Broader Connections