Centralized adjudicators solve trade by combining information storage with dispute resolution

Evidence

The institution that we model as the resolution of these problems is based on the presence of a specialized actor - a “judge” or “law merchant” (LM) who serves both as a repository of information and as an adjudicator of disputes. The core version of our model is based on the following assumptions. After any exchange, each party can accuse the other of cheating and appeal to the LM. Any dispute appealed to the LM is perfectly and honestly adjudicated at cost C to the plaintiff. — PAUL R. MILGRO, PAUL R. MILGRO - THE ROLE OF
, 79

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines the ‘law merchant’ institutional form that the model centers on.
  • ADDENDUM: The law merchant as a reputation-information infrastructure parallels how my ‘trees as infrastructure’ piece treats root grafts and living-root bridges — physical/social infrastructure enabling otherwise-impossible transactions.
  • XREF: connects to: Observable disputes in trade cannot be resolved without verification of the underlying claims — PAUL R. MILGRO, PAUL R. MILGRO - THE ROLE OF
, 68; Trade institutions must solve both an information and a punishment-motivation problem; Markets can organize exchange without requiring high levels of trust (+8 more)

Broader Connections