Nineteenth-century Orientalism was born from comparative philology
Related
- The Orientalist expert becomes the representative Oriental himself (similarity 0.88)
- Orientalism operates as a constraint on thought, not a positive doctrine. (similarity 0.88)
- Orientalism is chiefly a British and French cultural enterprise (similarity 0.88)
- Orientalism turned scattered testimony into a domesticated, categorical simulacrum of the Orient (similarity 0.87)
- Orientalists recycled predecessors’ texts instead of observing the real Orient (similarity 0.86)
- Orientalism becomes national authority when backed by state institutions (similarity 0.86)
- Orientalism is only the visible tip of a larger modern structure. (similarity 0.85)
- Early Orientalists codified and domesticated the Orient into a European province of learning. (similarity 0.85)
- Orientalist writing reduces the Orient to an occasion for Western male reverie. (similarity 0.84)
- Renan solidified Orientalism by attaching it to philology (similarity 0.83)
- Islamic Orientalists turned alienation into superiority rather than self-understanding (similarity 0.83)
- Orientalism functions as a systemic structure embedded in the modern project (similarity 0.83)
- Early academic Orientalism defined and controlled its subject through comparative, evaluative vocabulary. (similarity 0.82)
- Philology founded Orientalism as a science driven by European imperial acquisition (similarity 0.82)
- Orientalism was built on the state’s foundational distinction between civilized and uncivilized peoples. (similarity 0.82)