Negational identification can unite people who cannot agree on positive identity

Evidence

History is replete with examples of people, nations, and civilizations uniting around who and what they are not. Even if individuals cannot agree on who they are, they can often agree on who or what they are not: they are not the barbarian, the primitive, the Oriental, or the fundamentalist (Purdue, 2005). In one captivating historical example, the role of negational identification has been seen as a critical force driving major shifts in the Iranian political identity, first as non-Sunnis in the 16th century and then as non-Jews with the emergence of Israel (Duara, 1997). The construction of Israel as the common enemy allowed previously competing groups (pre-Israel Shiites and Sunnis) to bond and relate to each other. This example demonstrates that negational identification can be a significant prelude to cooperation among formerly warring factions. — Chen-Bo Zhong, Adam D. Galinsky, and Miguel M. Unzueta, Negational racial identity and…, 19

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Introduces the core concept of negational identification — defining oneself by what one is not.
  • XREF: Connects to in-group/out-group identity work in the We-They Engine thread, and to other accounts of enemy-based unity (e.g., Arendt on the Jews in ā€˜The Origins of Totalitarianism’). — connects to: Identity can be formed negationally by focusing on group non-membership. — Chen-Bo Zhong, Adam D. Galinsky, and Miguel M. Unzueta, Negational racial identity and…, 17; Negational identification unites out-groups through shared non-membership rather than shared membership. — Chen-Bo Zhong, Adam D. Galinsky, and Miguel M. Unzueta, Negational racial identity and…, 37; Negational identity may stem from low-status individuals’ need to feel superior (+11 more)

Broader Connections