Medieval Christian polemicists framed Islam as lust-driven heresy rather than separate religion

Evidence

The Christian authors of these polemical exchanges paint Islam as a heretical deviation from Christianity, attacking Muhammad as a false prophet who feigned a spiritual mission to satisfy his lust and ambition. They attack the Koran as contradictory and illogical. They ridicule Muslim polygamy and the promise of sexual pleasure in heaven. — John V. Tolan, Saracens, 801

Categorization

Category: Factual Claims

  • XREF: This ‘heresy not separate religion’ framing persists today and connects to the framing critique in ‘The Reluctant Fundamentalist.’ Also parallels the mischaracterization dynamics in the Complaints About Immodesty article about cross-cultural moral posturing.