Media framing of hate crimes as individual acts obscures state and media complicity

Evidence

The media coverage following the murders at Chapel Hill profiled Hicks as an irrational actor who was not influenced by the legal structures that aimed to cast Muslims as presumptive terrorists, a characterization that aligns with the prevailing understanding of Islamophobia as a “dislike of or prejudice against Muslims” generally exhibited by individuals. However, this narrow framing not only overlooks the state’s role in authorizing and emboldening the unfathomable acts (of private Islamophobia) undertaken by individuals like Craig Hicks, but it also overlooks the mutually reinforcing relationship between the state and media institutions like Fox News. — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding…, 103

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to Selod’s work on surveillance and state-driven suspicion of Muslims, and to the reader’s interest in the dialectic between state and private bias. — connects to: Mass media act as primary definers shaping public crime attitudes; Media framing shapes American attitudes toward Islam and jihad — Asena Karipek, Portrayals of Jihad: A Cause of…, 75; Framing discrimination as individual hate obscures its structural and policy-based causes — Evelyn Alsultany, Antisemitism and Islamophobia The…, 34 (+8 more)
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding…, 103

Broader Connections