Formal balance and impartiality in media mask real dominance of prevailing interpretations
Related
- Media are sites of struggle with relative autonomy from state and capital. (similarity 0.84)
- Negotiated decoding spaces are pivotal to media legitimacy (similarity 0.80)
- Communication distortion stems from asymmetric positions between producers and audiences. (similarity 0.80)
- Representation and misrepresentation differ only by degree within a shared field of discourse. (similarity 0.80)
- So-called objective accounts encode the standpoint of the powerful (similarity 0.80)
- An ultimate power to decide generates its own norms and cannot be trusted (similarity 0.80)
- Positivist media research defended pluralist assumptions about American society (similarity 0.80)
- The concept of ideology was born torn between historical relativism and universal truth. (similarity 0.79)
- Common sense is ambiguous and conservative, resisting new truths (similarity 0.79)
- Individual Muslim writers are not trapped by the interpretive frame that dominates their reception (similarity 0.79)
- Believing all media are biased pushes people toward sources biased in their favor. (similarity 0.79)
- Hegemony means tendential balance, not absolute class victory (similarity 0.79)
- Media reproduce dominant ideology through impartial professionalism, not open bias. (similarity 0.79)
- A social formation is a complex unity structured in dominance, not an expressive totality. (similarity 0.79)
- Mass media emerged with agrarian capitalism as culture itself became a commodity. (similarity 0.79)