Media’s lasting effect is an interpretive frame, not blurred perception

Evidence

No matter to what extent modern mass media tend to blur the difference between reality and the aesthetic, our realistic spectators are still aware that all is ‘in fun’. It cannot be assumed that the direct primary perception of reality takes place within the television frame of reference, although many movie-goers recall the alienation of familiar sights when leaving the theatre: everything still has the appearance of being part of the movie plot. What is more important is the interpretation of reality in terms of psychological carry-overs, the preparedness to see ordinary objects as though some threatening mystery were hidden behind them. Such an attitude seems to be syntonic with mass delusions such as suspicion of omnipresent graft, corruption, and conspiracy. — Theodor W. Adorno, The Culture Industry, 342

Categorization

  • XREF: Echoes the ‘paranoid style’ literature and Debord’s spectacle — the carry-over from screening to seeing conspiracy everywhere. — connects to: Cultural products shape perception so that reality seems to continue the medium’s world. — Theodor W. Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Dialectic of Enlightenment, 98; Media presence itself becomes the model that precedes and drains meaning from events — Jean Baudrillard, Simulacra and Simulation, 187; The internal psychological space has been fully penetrated by the media landscape — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk: The Collected and Unpublished…, 880 (+1 more)
  • SEED: Angle: how narrative media training teaches people to read ordinary reality as plotted — habit of seeing hidden design behind events.