Majority and minority revenge reactions are driven by different psychological factors

Evidence

The action of revenge of Hindus and Muslims was explained by different sets of factors. Identity and CV-related negative emotions were more important in explaining the revengeful reactions of Hindus, while in the case of Muslims relative power, FRD and FRD-related negative emotions were found more efficacious. — R. C. Tripathi, R. Kumar, and V. N. Tripathi, When the Advantaged Feel Victimised, 2

Categorization

• XREF: Contrast of identity-driven revenge in the dominant group versus power/deprivation-driven revenge in the subordinate group echoes the reader’s interest in how structurally dominant groups mobilize. — connects to: Narrated victimhood, not raw emotion, drives revenge among the advantaged group.; Collective narcissism drives hierarchy-reinforcing action in perpetrator groups but hierarchy-challenging action in victim groups. — Nurit Shnabel and Johannes Ullrich, Identity Needs in Intergroup Relations:…, 129; Different intergroup threats trigger distinct emotions and behavioral responses. — Blake M. Riek, Eric W. Mania, and Samuel L. Gaertner, Intergroup Threat and Outgroup…, 66

Broader Connections

• Narrated victimhood, not raw emotion, drives revenge among the advantaged group. #expands (0.85)
• Collective narcissism drives hierarchy-reinforcing action in perpetrator groups but hierarchy-challenging action in victim groups. #exemplifies (0.85) — Nurit Shnabel and Johannes Ullrich, Identity Needs in Intergroup Relations, 129
• Different intergroup threats trigger distinct emotions and behavioral responses. #corroborates (0.75) — Blake M. Riek, Eric W. Mania, and Samuel L. Gaertner, Intergroup Threat and Outgroup Attitudes, 66