Hindu victimhood arises from ingroup identity, not from relative disadvantage.

Evidence

In the case of the Hindus, it was found that ingroup identity and negative emotions associated with collective victimhood and FRD predicted collective victimhood significantly but not the factors associated with their advantageous position in the social structure such as relative power and FRD. Thus, in the case of Hindus, greater awareness of identity appeared behind their feelings of victimhood. — R. C. Tripathi, R. Kumar, and V. N. Tripathi, When the Advantaged Feel Victimised, 53

Categorization

  • XREF: This is precisely the weak-identity/accountability-evasion mechanism the reader seeks to test cross-nationally — identity, not actual powerlessness, predicts claimed victimhood. — connects to: An advantaged Hindu majority reports stronger collective victimhood than the Muslim minority — R. C. Tripathi, R. Kumar, and V. N. Tripathi, When the Advantaged Feel Victimised:…, 2; Hindu victimhood claims run on historical memories, not discrete events. — R. C. Tripathi, R. Kumar, and V. N. Tripathi, When the Advantaged Feel Victimised:…, 11; Hindu victimhood narratives rest on medieval Muslim invasions — R. C. Tripathi, R. Kumar, and V. N. Tripathi, When the Advantaged Feel Victimised:…, 12 (+4 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: The claim that privileged-group victimhood is predicted by identity salience rather than structural disadvantage is a core, transferable finding.

Broader Connections