Leadership acts on followers through collective group norms, not just individual exchange

Evidence

What, then, determines whether and when followers invest their faith in a leader and open themselves up to the process of transformation? The ostensible answer is often provided in intraor interpersonal terms. Yet often there is at least an implicit acknowledgement that a collective level of analysis is important as well. Thus, as we have already seen, transformational theories emphasize the redefinition of group norms and objectives. Along similar lines, House’s (1971) path-goal theory sees the successful leader as someone who engages followers’ wills by reconciling their personal goals with those of the collective. — Stephen Reicher, S. Alexander Haslam, and Nick Hopkins, Social identity and the dynamics of…, 34

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly serves the reading purpose: multiple leadership literatures arrive at collective-level analysis, converging on the shared-identity account the reader is testing. — connects to: Leadership theory wrestles with celebrating influence without endorsing tyranny. — Stephen Reicher, S. Alexander Haslam, and Nick Hopkins, Social identity and the dynamics of…, 20; No stable traits distinguish leaders from followers or predict effectiveness — Stephen Reicher, S. Alexander Haslam, and Nick Hopkins, Social identity and the dynamics of…, 27; A charismatic leader can give isolated youth the sense of existing through group power. — Ryan Andrew Brown, Todd C. Helmus, Rajeev Ramchand, Alina I. Palimaru, Sarah Weilant, Ashley L. Rhoades, and Liisa Hiatt (RAND Corporation), Violent Extremism in America:…, 376 (+18 more)

Broader Connections