Judicial desegregation policies prospered in politics’ absence.

Evidence

On the national stage, the forces set in motion by the original uprising of the Silent Majority undermined the spatial and socioeconomic remedies necessary to confront widespread patterns of metropolitan inequality. Ultimately, the reliance on the NAACP and the judicial branch to devise, implement, and enforce the nation’s desegregation policies illustrated the absence of a political coalition willing to address the suburban fusion of racial and class segregation or even to acknowledge that this represented a New American Dilemma at all. — Matthew D. Lassiter, The Suburban Origins of “Color-Blind”…, 113

Categorization

  • XREF: New American Dilemma invokes Hochschild’s book (note 26); also echoes the reader’s existing work on segregation rebranding under political retreat. — connects to: Charlotte’s two-way busing plan integrated while white flight stayed minimal — Matthew D. Lassiter, The Suburban Origins of “Color-Blind”…, 94; The 1999 return to neighborhood schools reflects politicized law. — Matthew D. Lassiter, The Suburban Origins of “Color-Blind”…, 113; Court-ordered desegregation of public spaces produced resegregation and private alternatives, not integration — Kevin M. Kruse, White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of…, 250 (+5 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: The claim that naming segregation requires an enforcing coalition — law without politics retrenches — is a dense insight connecting race, federalism and legal instrumentalism.

Broader Connections