Forced into retreat, segregation rebranded itself in the language of choice and local autonomy.

Evidence

Tom Harris opened the rally by declaring that the CPA refused to discuss either segregation or integration, as policy and on principle, but instead would defend the right of all families to freedom of choice and oppose the forced busing of any children away from neighborhood schools. The leaders of the organization also demanded that the school board appeal the court order, a position that reflected the widespread fear among white families that elected officials, with the tacit approval of the downtown business establishment, would try to avoid legal confrontation by following the consensus path of the Charlotte Way. — Matthew D. Lassiter, The Suburban Origins of “Color-Blind”…, 34

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly parallels the reader’s stated purpose: the exact moment a rationalizing ideology (segregation) re-describes itself in individualist terms under legal siege. — connects to: A losing local antibusing revolt still rewrote national integration policy to protect suburbs. — Matthew D. Lassiter, The Suburban Origins of “Color-Blind”…, 17; Segregation shifted from within cities to between cities from the 1950s onward. — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 379; Desegregation pressure forced segregationists to reinvent themselves as respectable homeowners — Kevin M. Kruse, White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of…, 106 (+8 more)
  • recurring: this claim recurs 3 times within its source

Broader Connections