Institutional bricolage operates through alteration, aggregation, and articulation.

Evidence

These actions are analyzed through de Koning’s three processes of institutional bricolage (2011): alteration (minimal compliance with bureaucratic requirements while maintaining existing governance), aggregation (repurposing settlement institutions to manage projects), and articulation (resisting external sanctions that conflicted with local norms). — Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth, Institutional Bricolage and Commoning…, 4

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines a three-part typology useful for analyzing how local communities adapt external governance frameworks.
  • corroborated: 3 independent passages support this claim — Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth, Institutional Bricolage and Commoning…, 4
  • XREF: connects to: Communities adapt externally imposed development projects through bricolage processes of alteration, aggregation, and articulation. — Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth, Institutional Bricolage and Commoning…, 151; Public institutional routines change incrementally rather than through wholesale overhauls — Roderick M. Kramer, Geoffrey J. Leonardelli, Robert W. Livingston, Social Cognition, Social Identity, and…, 424; Bricolage thrives where external frameworks fail to align with local realities. — Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth, Institutional Bricolage and Commoning…, 22

Broader Connections