Bricolage thrives where external frameworks fail to align with local realities.

Evidence

Institutional bricolage plays an important role, particularly when there are “voids,” absent or weak formal institutions (Ingram et al., 2015). It also emerges in the in-between areas, where formal institutions are either insufficient or in conflict with socially-embedded institutions (de Mattos Vieira et al., 2019). Such conditions are common in externally imposed projects and legal frameworks, which often fail to align with local realities. As projects are implemented, they can create feedback loops that reshape both the interventions themselves and the local institutions (Steenbergen & Warren, 2018). — Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth, Institutional Bricolage and Commoning…, 22

Categorization

  • ADDENDUM: Connects to ‘Grafting & Growth’ in that externally imposed frameworks reshape local social fabric, much as introduced species or infrastructural schemes do to ecosystems — both treat mismatch as a generative, feedback-driven process.
  • corroborated: 3 independent passages support this claim — Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth, Institutional Bricolage and Commoning…, 22
  • XREF: connects to: Institutional bricolage operates through alteration, aggregation, and articulation. — Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth, Institutional Bricolage and Commoning…, 4; Institutional bricolage faces hard limits on what repurposed arrangements can achieve. — Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth, Institutional Bricolage and Commoning…, 122; Communities adapt externally imposed development projects through bricolage processes of alteration, aggregation, and articulation. — Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth, Institutional Bricolage and Commoning…, 151

Broader Connections