Hobbes’s exclusionary frame is cultural-historical civility rather than biological race

Evidence

As this excerpt suggests exemplarily, and as the rest of the paper will argue, Hobbes’s texts are constructing a certain image of civilization, a form of exclusion and domination eschewing biological determinism for a social, historical, one. This ‘civilizational’ thinking certainly can work – and will work later on in conjunction with modern racism and white privilege – to exclude many. — , Stephanie B. Martens - Civilization and
, 25

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Sharply distinguishes ‘biologically racist’ from ‘civilizational’ exclusion — a taxonomical distinction central to the chapter’s whole argument.
  • SEED: Angle: how cultural/civilizational hierarchy does exclusion’s work without ever declaring race — the ‘polite racism’ analogue across eras.
  • XREF: connects to: Calling Hobbes a racist need not be anachronistic. — , Stephanie B. Martens - Civilization and
, 17; Hobbes locates his hypothesized state of nature in the living present of Americas’ peoples — , Stephanie B. Martens - Civilization and
, 24; Hobbes supplied the theoretical premise of excluding humanity that race doctrines need (+8 more)

Broader Connections