Hegemony lets ideologies operate without any locatable authority.

Evidence

Structures of authority need not be as all-encompassing as in this situation. In our final example, we demonstrate how interactional dynamics may shore up ideological structures even in the absence of a locatable powerful authority. This is the process that Antonio Gramsci (1971) calls hegemony. β€” Mary Bucholtz and Kira Hall, Identity and Interaction, 103

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines the specifically interactional sense of Gramscian hegemony vis-a-vis centralized authority.
  • XREF: Connects to Gramsci’s hegemony and to the reader’s interest in the micro-mechanisms of identity being kept open in interaction rather than imposed from above. β€” connects to: Ideologies can entrench without any deliberate design by their inventors β€” Daryl Levinson and Benjamin I. Sachs, Political Entrenchment and Public Law, 494; Institutional racism can operate without any individual intent. β€” David Theo Goldberg, John Solomos, A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, 1864; A ruling party exercises hegemonic power without formal juridical rule β€” Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 944 (+5 more)

Broader Connections