Gramsci links unconscious common sense to active ideologies that can organize masses.

Evidence

Culturalism’s strengths can almost be derived from the weaknesses of the structuralist position already noted, and from the latter’s strategic absences and silences. It has insisted, correctly, on the affirmative moment of the development of conscious struggle and organization as a necessary element in the analysis of history, ideology, and consciousness: against its persistent downgrading in the structuralist paradigm. Here, again, it is largely Gramsci who has provided us with a set of more refined terms through which to link the largely “unconscious” and given cultural categories of “common sense” with the formation of more active and organic ideologies, which have the capacity to intervene in the ground of common sense and popular traditions and, through such interventions, to organize masses of men and women. — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 202

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

  • DEFINE: Explains Gramsci’s mechanism connecting common sense to organic ideology via intervention.
  • XREF: Connects to Gramsci’s hegemony notion and Hall’s later work on Thatcherism.

Broader Connections