Guaranteeing autonomous expression of diverse identities can unify rather than fragment a movement.

Evidence

Claeys and Duncan (2019), for instance, illustrate how the global food sovereignty movement’s commitment to guarantee the autonomous expression of diverse identities and perspectives within the convergence space did not fragment the movement, but rather enabled it to come together (see also Flesher‐Fominaya, 2010b). — Michelle I. Gawerc, Coalition-building and the forging of…, 234

Categorization

  • XREF: A concrete empirical answer to the reading question: protective solidarity that is explicitly non-homogenizing yet cohesive. Compare against homogenizing union/party models. — connects to: Guaranteeing space for diverse identities can unite rather than fragment a movement.; Individual identity forms dialogically through a constitutive outside, not autonomously. — Stuart Hall, Essential Essays, Volume 2: Identity…, 363; Identity is constituted through exclusion of what it is not (+10 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: The counterintuitive core of the whole project — that safe space for difference is what enables convergence — is dense enough to sit with.

Broader Connections