Guaranteeing space for diverse identities can unite rather than fragment a movement.

Evidence

What they said was, “We may be different actual color skins but vis-à-vis the social system, vis-à-vis the political system of racism, there is more that unites us than what divides us.” People begin to ask, “Are you from Jamaica? Are you from Trinidad? Are you from Barbados?” You can just see the process of divide and rule. “No. Just address me as I am. I know you can’t tell the difference so just call me black. Try using that. We all look the same, you know. Certainly can’t tell the difference. Just call me black. Black identity.” Antiracism in the 1970s was only fought and only resisted in the community, in the localities, behind the slogan of a black politics and the black experience. — Stuart Hall, Essential Essays, Volume 2, 244 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

In some ways, because camp leveled its participants’ relationship to Iranian identity for the sake of equity (recalling Mana’s speech: “I don’t care if you are one-half, one-fourth … alien”) it accepted the risk of excluding difference for the reward of consensus and community. Vectors of class, gender, religion, and mixed racedness were conscientiously muted in the controlled setting of camp, but they never went away. — Neda Maghbouleh, The Limits of Whiteness, 517 (#qualifies, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Real inclusion in coalitions paradoxically requires marginalized groups to have separate space. — Michelle I. Gawerc, Coalition-building and the forging of…, 204; Coalitions across divides work better decentralized, prioritizing local knowledge and autonomy. — Michelle I. Gawerc, Coalition-building and the forging of…, 215; The preference for segregated space is culturally produced, not innate. (+3 more)

Broader Connections