So-called objective accounts encode the standpoint of the powerful
Related
- Power generates the will of the power-holder rather than serving it (similarity 0.84)
- Analyzing power requires simultaneously reworking both theory and historical method (similarity 0.84)
- Ideologues claiming the key to reality must adapt to every new event (similarity 0.82)
- An ultimate power to decide generates its own norms and cannot be trusted (similarity 0.82)
- Specific meaning arises only from an arbitrary contingent break (similarity 0.82)
- Major trust theorists claim rational-choice accounts leave something essential out (similarity 0.81)
- Historical change forces theorists to invent new, more concrete concepts (similarity 0.81)
- Trust is inductively corrigible by objective experience (similarity 0.81)
- Dominant powers benefit from engineering their subjects’ inability to trust (similarity 0.81)
- Humans can recognize thousands while social worlds cater to the least clever (similarity 0.81)
- Costly signaling and CRED theories complement rather than contradict. (similarity 0.81)
- Trust is merely evidence-based expectation while trustworthiness is motivational (similarity 0.81)
- Information content is defined by surprise or improbability, not repetition (similarity 0.81)
- Novelistic protagonists need not pursue individual fulfillment to be compelling (similarity 0.81)
- Hegemony must be won before power is seized, not merely imposed by force after (similarity 0.81)