Earning money dramatically reduces dictators’ willingness to share it.

Evidence

In a study by Cherry et al. (2002), half of the participants took a quiz and earned either 10 or 40, depending on how well they answered. In a second phase, these participants became dictators and were each told to divide the money they had earned between themselves and another participant who had not been given the opportunity to take the quiz. The baseline condition was an otherwise identical dictator game but without the earning phase. Dictators gave much less in the earning than in the baseline condition: 79% of the 10 earners and 70% of the 40 earners gave nothing at all, compared to 19% and 15% in the matching no-earning conditions. By simply manipulating the dictator’s sense of entitlement, the transfer of resources is drastically reduced. — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality, 115

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Dictators share money only to the extent recipients’ earned it, not to help them. — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality: The…, 122; Dictators respect others’ earned property but not windfall money. — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality: The…, 118

Broader Connections