Different intergroup threats evoke different emotions, not a single unified response.

Evidence

Smith’s (1993) intergroup emotions theory proposes that different intergroup contexts lead to different emotional reactions. For example, outgroups that are seen as potentially taking away ingroup resources may elicit anger, whereas outgroups that are perceived to block the ingroup from obtaining desired resources may result in frustration. — Blake M. Riek, Eric W. Mania, and Samuel L. Gaertner, Intergroup Threat and Outgroup Attitudes, 139

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Frames the link between threat type and discrete emotions (anger vs. frustration) in the intergroup emotions theory.
  • XREF: connects to: Different intergroup threats trigger distinct emotions and behavioral responses. — Blake M. Riek, Eric W. Mania, and Samuel L. Gaertner, Intergroup Threat and Outgroup…, 66; Distinct intergroup emotions have separate causes and behavioral effects — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 2282; Distinct emotions rather than a single pool of hatred drive intergroup prejudice — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years…, 2282 (+4 more)

Broader Connections