Different negative emotions drive distinct types of prejudice and responses

Evidence

Because Allport defined prejudice as an antipathy, he emphasized negative emotions as a critical element of intergroup relations. Allport devoted three chapters to these emotions: chapter 21, “Frustration”; chapter 22, “Aggression and Hatred”; chapter 23, “Anxiety, Sex, Guilt.” Contemporary prejudice research has recently “rediscovered” emotions and how different emotions may reflect different types of prejudice and precipitate different kinds of responses (Smith & Mackie). — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice, 120

Contemporary prejudice research has recently “rediscovered” emotions and how different emotions may reflect different types of prejudice and precipitate different kinds of responses (Smith & Mackie). — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 120

Categorization

• corroborated: 7 independent passages support this claim — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years…, 120; , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 120
• XREF: connects to: Different threat types trigger distinct emotions that shape reactions — Blake M. Riek, Eric W. Mania, and Samuel L. Gaertner, Intergroup Threat and Outgroup…, 66; Specific stereotype combinations elicit distinct prejudiced emotions toward out-groups. — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 15; Distinct structural relations produce qualitatively different forms of prejudice — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 305