Courts deny Muslims racial discrimination protection because ‘race’ is ill-defined in law.

Evidence

Legal authorities from common law jurisdictions, such as Australia and the UK, suggest that for the purpose of discrimination law, Muslims are not considered a race and therefore cannot access protections under racial discrimination provisions. The problem here is not only the lingering belief that Islam is a religion and that discrimination against Muslim individuals is therefore religious and not racial in nature … Although this perception remains part of the problem, the legal response to Islamophobia also hints a broader problem with law’s under­ standing of race. Despite legislative references to race, the term itself remains ill-defined in law, leaving courts searching for an understanding of what it means to be discriminated against because of race, which has proven parti­ cular challenging in the context of racialized religion. — Mareike Riedel, Islamophobia, Racial Discrimination…, 11

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly connected to the reading purpose — the protected-vs-unprotected-category legal question the reader is investigating. — connects to: Courts deny Muslims race discrimination protection absent proof of self-unification. — Mareike Riedel, Islamophobia, Racial Discrimination…, 55; Courts deny Muslims anti-racism protection when they lack shared self-identification — Mareike Riedel, Islamophobia, Racial Discrimination…, 55; Muslims’ racial diversity undermines race-based legal claims (+6 more)
  • DEFINE: Establishes the core mismatch: racialization theory sees Islamophobia as race-like, but law confines race to phenotype/religion categories.

Broader Connections