Conviviality theory loses critical force when divorced from state racism and hierarchy.

Evidence

In much of the literature on ‘everyday multiculture’, racism is insufficiently theorised, structural relations of hierarchy and inequality fade from view, and culture loses its unruly potential. This article seeks to rethink and reclaim the radical potential of conviviality, by working with the narratives of people deported from the UK to Jamaica. The article first argues that the social and political implications of conviviality can be better registered when placed in relation to state violence and state racism. — Luke de Noronha, The conviviality of the overpoliced,…, 5

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to critiques of ‘everyday multiculture’ celebratory sociology and to Gilroy’s own humanism, plus the ‘complaints about immodesty’ essay’s interest in how moral-panic discourse obscures structural drivers. — connects to: Conviviality loses its political force when equated with everyday multiculture — Luke de Noronha, The conviviality of the overpoliced,…, 22; Structural hierarchy suppresses the development of commoner subjectivity. — Yael Arbell, The Circle of Commoning:…, 90; Racism’s targets shift as the dominant state form changes over time — James Renton, Ben Gidley (eds.), Antisemitism and Islamophobia in…, 71 (+4 more)
  • SHARE: Send to anyone researching migration/deportation or critical race sociology who might appreciate a paper theorizing conviviality from the standpoint of deportees.
  • corroborated: 4 independent passages support this claim — Luke de Noronha, The conviviality of the overpoliced,…, 5

Broader Connections