Britain effaced Egypt’s role in the Sudan by reattributing its history.

Related

• Sudanese slaves in Egypt became a flashpoint in British-Egyptian disputes over independence. (similarity 0.89)
• Egyptian nationalism paired aggression toward Sudan with defensiveness toward Britain. (similarity 0.89)
• Both Egyptians and British failed to conceptualize southern Sudanese former slaves politically (similarity 0.89)
• Egyptian expansion into Africa collided with British abolitionism in the Nile Valley. (similarity 0.89)
• Kämil blamed the British for turning the Sudanese against Egyptian rule. (similarity 0.89)
• Egyptian nationalists adopted British colonial categories to justify dominating the Sudanese. (similarity 0.89)
• Egyptian anti-British nationalism preserved the internal racial hierarchy over Sudanese (similarity 0.89)
• Egyptian and British stereotypes of Sudan as savage persisted unchanged for decades (similarity 0.89)
• British commemoration of Gordon rendered Egypt’s role in Sudan anonymous (similarity 0.88)
• Egyptian nationalists reclaimed Sudan as Egypt’s colonial right by conquest. (similarity 0.88)
• Egyptian colonial writers justified domination by styling Sudanese identity as deficient (similarity 0.88)
• Egypt deployed Sudan as an internal penal and exile site (similarity 0.87)
• Egyptian writers erased the Nubian-Sudanese distinction under one stereotype (similarity 0.87)
• Egyptian rule made Sudan the first interior African region to feel Western colonial tensions. (similarity 0.87)
• An Egyptian governor of Sudan’s Equatoria was excluded from Cairo’s Geographic Society. (similarity 0.86)