Some Sudanese tribes and traders profited from the Turkïya despite denouncing it
Related
- Egyptian and British stereotypes of Sudan as savage persisted unchanged for decades (similarity 0.85)
- Egyptian colonial writers justified domination by styling Sudanese identity as deficient (similarity 0.84)
- Sudanese slaves in Egypt became a flashpoint in British-Egyptian disputes over independence. (similarity 0.84)
- Sudanese traders and northern tribes profited heavily under Egyptian rule. (similarity 0.84)
- Egyptian rule made Sudan the first interior African region to feel Western colonial tensions. (similarity 0.84)
- Egyptian writers erased the Nubian-Sudanese distinction under one stereotype (similarity 0.84)
- Lutfi al-Sayyid declared colonization of the Sudan a right and duty of Egyptians. (similarity 0.84)
- Some Sudanese tribes and traders profited under Ottoman-Egyptian rule. (similarity 0.84)
- Britain effaced Egypt’s role in the Sudan by reattributing its history. (similarity 0.84)
- Mehmed Ali first looked to Sudanese slaves rather than Egyptian peasants for his army (similarity 0.83)
- Egyptian nationalists ventriloquized fake Sudanese voices instead of seeking real Sudanese allies (similarity 0.83)
- Both Egyptians and British failed to conceptualize southern Sudanese former slaves politically (similarity 0.83)
- Egyptian anti-British nationalism preserved the internal racial hierarchy over Sudanese (similarity 0.83)
- Egyptian nationalists adopted British colonial categories to justify dominating the Sudanese. (similarity 0.83)
- The Sudan invasion primarily aimed to capture men for the army (similarity 0.83)