British administrators argued slavery did not offend Egyptian public morality.
Related
- Antislavery ideology was used to dismiss Egypt’s empire and justify Britain’s own. (similarity 0.86)
- Both Egyptians and British failed to conceptualize southern Sudanese former slaves politically (similarity 0.86)
- Sudanese slaves in Egypt became a flashpoint in British-Egyptian disputes over independence. (similarity 0.86)
- The antislavery convention pitted British officials against Egyptians who defended household slavery. (similarity 0.86)
- British abolitionism proved a doctrinal crisis for Egyptian nationalism (similarity 0.84)
- Egyptian elites openly sought to close the Slave Trade Bureau in the 1890s (similarity 0.84)
- Egyptian expansion into Africa collided with British abolitionism in the Nile Valley. (similarity 0.84)
- Britain effaced Egypt’s role in the Sudan by reattributing its history. (similarity 0.84)
- Egyptian and British stereotypes of Sudan as savage persisted unchanged for decades (similarity 0.83)
- Even anticolonial Egyptian nationalists reproduced demeaning stereotypes of Sudanese slaves. (similarity 0.83)
- Egyptian anti-British nationalism preserved the internal racial hierarchy over Sudanese (similarity 0.83)
- Kämil blamed the British for turning the Sudanese against Egyptian rule. (similarity 0.83)
- Egyptian nationalists adopted British colonial categories to justify dominating the Sudanese. (similarity 0.83)
- Egyptian nationalism paired aggression toward Sudan with defensiveness toward Britain. (similarity 0.82)
- British antislavery pressure produced the 1877 Anglo-Egyptian Convention to end the slave trade (similarity 0.82)