Authority rests on learned competence within a division of labor, not grace

Evidence

It follows that whatever prevents the individual from uncovering his own premises can be only the complexity of concrete relationships and not something like the hidden nature of truth, or social constraints on revealing them. Accordingly, authority is not a matter of wisdom bestowed by grace on a few people, but a matter of some specific competence learned, and practised, within the framework of the division of labour. — Niklas Luhmann, Trust and Power, 217

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly relevant to Stevens’s total deference — he treats authority as grace-bestowed when modernity defines it as contractual competence, which is the source of his ethical abdication. — connects to: Competence, not power, determines status in functioning societies. — Jordan B. Peterson, 12 Rules for Life An Antidote to Chaos, 910; Authority builds from accumulated past compliance without requiring ongoing justification; Modern individuals derive their ideals from specialized occupational roles, not unified cultural wholes — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 847 (+14 more)
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Niklas Luhmann, Trust and Power, 217

Broader Connections