Division of labour shifts evaluation from moral to technical criteria

Evidence

Once the action has been mediated, the action’s ultimate effects are located outside that relatively narrow area of intercourse inside which moral drives retain their regulating force. Obversely, acts contained within that morally pregnant area are for most of the participants or their witnesses innocuous enough not to come under moral censure. Minute division of labour, as well as the sheer length of the chain of acts that mediate between the initiative and its tangible effects, emancipates most – however decisive – constituents of the collective venture from moral significance and scrutiny. They are still subject to analysis and evaluation – but criteria are technical, not moral. ‘Problems’ call for better, more rational designs, not for soul-searching. The actors occupy themselves with the rational task of finding better means for the given – and partial – end, not with a moral task of the evaluation of the ultimate objective (of which they have but a vague idea, or for which they do not feel responsible). — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 554

Categorization

  • XREF: This is the exact mechanism the Islamophobia readings will need — how bureaucratic rationality desubjectifies. Also resonates with Weber’s rationalization and the ‘administration of things’ theme. — connects to: Bureaucracy’s essence is dissociating means from moral evaluation of ends — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 289; Functional division of labour makes individual acts multifinal and morally meaning-void — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 292; Bureaucracy shifts moral concern from targets onto superiors’ judgment — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 455 (+1 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: The claim that ‘problems call for better designs, not soul-searching’ captures the dissolution of moral agency into technical problem-solving — a dense, reusable insight into modern rationality.

Broader Connections