Authoritarian-era organizational practices determine successor parties’ democratic survival skills

Evidence

If the sources of these elite resources lie in previous authoritarian practices, these skills and usable pasts should reflect the variation in the organizational practices of the ancien regime. In the case of the communist successor parties, predemocratic organizational practices – internal policies of recruitment and advancement, policy reform, and negotiation with the opposition – influenced the elites’ degree of pragmatic orientation, their ability and will to centralize the parties, and their skill in responding to and communicating effectively with the public, respectively. — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past, 88

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly answers the reader’s core question of which parties survived democratization — the answer is those whose elites carried usable skills from authoritarian-era practices. — connects to: Prior organizational practices, not ideology, shaped successor party strategies — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past: The…, 101; Skills that sustained authoritarian rule can be repurposed for democratic success afterward — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past: The…, 122; Authoritarian party organizations paradoxically produced skilled elites that won democratic competition — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past: The…, 139 (+8 more)

Broader Connections