Antiterrorism frames enemies as aberrant individuals rather than political claimants.

Evidence

First, there is a difference in the way that the enemy is conceived. Whereas the first paradigm regards insurgents as the “representatives of deeper claims at the heart of society” (and it is important to understand the reasons for this, in order to counteract them effectively), the second one, by labeling them “terrorist,” regards them above all as “aberrant individuals,” dangerous figures, quite simply mad, or as incarnations of pure evil. — Grégoire Chamayou, A Theory of the Drone, 279

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s framing of the ‘twisted logic’ of impunity and depoliticized killing. — connects to: Counterterrorism rhetoric masks an offensive campaign against Muslims.; Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act enforcement targeted Muslims despite neutral wording. — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding
, 259; Categorizing one’s enemy as sub-human legitimizes increased violence and justifies violation of basic human rights. — Dehumanization (+1 more)

Broader Connections